Our Standard: Simple Language, Clear Meaning, Responsible Content
At TheSimpleGrammar.com, an explanation should make a grammar concept easier to understand, not add another layer of confusion. Our editorial guidelines describe the principles we aim to follow when preparing, reviewing, publishing, and updating educational content.
These standards help us keep our resources focused on readers and their language-learning needs.
1. Every Page Starts With a Purpose
We believe educational content should answer a real question.
Before developing a topic, we consider what readers may be trying to understand, which part of the subject needs clarification, and what information would help them move forward.
Our content may cover grammar fundamentals, verb tenses, sentence structure, punctuation, word usage, common mistakes, and related English-language topics.
A page should have a clear subject and provide useful information rather than repeat material simply to increase its length.
2. Explain It in Plain English
Grammar terminology can be useful, but it should not prevent readers from understanding the lesson.
We aim to use familiar words, meaningful headings, short explanations, and examples that connect the concept to everyday English.
When a technical term is necessary, we try to explain what it means before relying on it throughout the article.
Our preferred approach is straightforward: introduce the idea, explain the rule, demonstrate it, and clarify any important limitations.
3. Check the Rule, Not Just the Wording
A sentence can sound convincing and still contain an incorrect explanation. For this reason, grammar content needs more than a basic spelling check.
Where appropriate, we aim to review:
- Whether the grammar rule is described correctly
- Whether definitions match the topic
- Whether examples demonstrate the stated point
- Whether punctuation and spelling are accurate
- Whether similar words or structures are clearly distinguished
- Whether important exceptions or variations need mentioning
Relevant dictionaries, grammar references, and established style guides may be consulted when a question requires additional verification.
We do not treat an explanation as correct simply because it appears frequently online.
4. Examples Must Support the Lesson
Examples are an important part of our educational approach.
A useful example should show readers how a rule works in a real sentence. It should also fit the explanation that comes before it.
We aim to avoid examples that are unnecessarily complicated, unnatural, or unrelated to the point being taught.
Where a comparison helps explain a concept, examples may show the difference between two sentence patterns or demonstrate how changing a word can affect meaning.
5. Grammar Rules Need Context
Not every language question has one answer that applies equally to every situation.
English usage can vary between American and British English, formal and informal communication, and different writing contexts. Some questions concern established grammar rules, while others involve style preferences.
When these distinctions are important, we aim to explain them rather than present a preference as a universal rule.
Our goal is to help readers understand both the language pattern and the situation in which it may be appropriate.
6. Content Should Be Original and Useful
We aim to develop explanations that provide readers with genuine educational value.
Content should not rely on copying another website’s articles or changing a few words while keeping the same material. Information from relevant references may inform an explanation, but our published presentation should be independently written and organized.
We also aim to avoid unnecessary repetition, exaggerated claims, misleading promises, and paragraphs that do not help answer the reader’s question.
7. Search Optimization Must Not Harm Readability
Search engines can help readers discover useful grammar resources, but content should remain natural and readable.
Relevant terms may be included in titles, headings, introductions, and explanations when they fit the subject.
We aim to avoid keyword stuffing, awkward repetition, misleading headlines, and content created solely to attract search traffic without providing meaningful help.
A page should serve the reader first.
8. How We Review Content
Before publication, content may be reviewed for its structure, clarity, accuracy, examples, spelling, punctuation, and relevance to the stated topic.
The level of review may vary according to the subject and the complexity of the explanation.
We also consider whether the page answers its central question without leaving readers to work through unnecessary details.
These are the standards we aim to follow; they should not be interpreted as a claim that every page has undergone a particular formal certification or specialist review.
9. Corrections Are Part of Publishing
No educational resource should assume that every published page will remain perfect forever.
If a reader identifies a possible error, unclear sentence, broken link, or misleading example, we welcome the opportunity to investigate it.
When reviewing a reported issue, we consider the relevant context and available references before making a change.
Confirmed errors may be corrected, explanations may be rewritten, and examples may be replaced when doing so improves understanding.
10. Keeping Existing Pages Useful
Content can become less helpful when examples are unclear, explanations are incomplete, or readers struggle to find the information they need.
We may revisit existing pages to:
- Correct errors
- Improve sentence examples
- Clarify difficult concepts
- Add relevant context
- Remove unnecessary repetition
- Improve headings and organization
- Update information where needed
Not every change requires a complete rewrite. Sometimes a small correction can make an explanation much clearer.
11. The Role of Technology
Digital tools, including spelling checkers and AI-assisted tools, may help with drafting, editing, organization, or other publishing tasks.
However, generated or automated suggestions should not be accepted without appropriate consideration.
Content still needs to be checked for meaning, grammar, context, natural wording, and usefulness. Technology can support editorial work, but it should not replace careful judgment about whether an explanation is accurate.
12. Advertising and Editorial Decisions
If advertising or third-party services are used on TheSimpleGrammar.com, their presence should not determine whether a grammar explanation is presented as correct.
Educational content should be developed according to its relevance, clarity, and accuracy. Commercial material should not be disguised as independent educational guidance.
Any advertising or commercial disclosures will be handled in accordance with applicable requirements.
13. Reader Feedback Helps Us Improve
Readers often notice questions that deserve a clearer explanation or a dedicated guide.
We welcome suggestions about topics, examples, confusing wording, and possible corrections. Although we cannot guarantee that every suggestion will result in a new article or immediate change, feedback can help identify areas for improvement.
When contacting us, please include the page topic and explain the issue as specifically as possible.
Our Editorial Commitment
TheSimpleGrammar.com aims to make English grammar easier to approach through clear explanations, useful examples, and responsible publishing practices.
Our central standard is simple: content should help readers understand how English works and make better-informed choices when using it.
Contact Us
For editorial questions, correction requests, or suggestions for future content, please contact us.
TheSimpleGrammar.com
Email: support@thesimplegrammar.com
Address: 2202 North Westshore Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33607, United States
